The Flamingo case has deeply affected Aruba. What began as a criminal investigation into corruption, forgery, and abuse of power within the public administration resulted in a series of verdicts that included a mix of acquittals and relatively light sentences. Where many had hoped for harsher sentences in the form of lengthy prison terms, those convicted received community service, suspended sentences, and temporary disqualifications from their rights as public officials and politicians. This begs the question: are these punishments sufficient to combat corruption and restore integrity?
The answer is complex. Yes, punishment is necessary as a deterrent and in retaliation for wrongs that have undermined trust in government. But at the same time, we must recognize that the real fight against corruption is not about the severity of punishments, but about the values we as a society strive for.
The Limits of Punitive Measures
The community is understandably disappointed with the relatively light sentences. Many expected those responsible to end up behind bars for long periods of time, given the damage their actions have caused. Swindling the country, misusing public funds and violating the public trust are serious offenses.
Yet we must remember that punishment, no matter how severe, is not the only weapon against corruption. Even the threat of years in prison will not deter everyone from committing abuses of power, fraud or other crimes. If the only reason to obey the law is fear of punishment, then we have a fundamental problem as a society.
Integrity as a Compass
Fighting corruption does not start with the level of penalties, but with a culture of integrity. It should be natural for officials, politicians and citizens to act honestly, transparently and responsibly. Not because they fear being punished, but because they believe it is the right thing to do. A society cannot function if integrity is replaced by calculating behavior: "How much can I do without getting caught?" or "What is the penalty if I get caught?"
The Flamingo case is a harsh reminder of what can go wrong when integrity is lacking. It shows us the risks of a culture where nepotism, abuse of power and personal interests take precedence over the common good. But it also offers an opportunity to reflect and change.
A Message for the Future
We must not forget that the damage caused by corruption is not only material. It erodes the trust citizens have in their government, the foundation of a healthy democracy. This trust is much harder to restore than a financial loss.
Therefore, the call to future officials and politicians is clear: Don't be guided by fear of punishment or hope for personal gain. Let integrity be your guide. Don't say "I'm not doing it because I might get caught," but "I'm not doing it because it's wrong."
Punitive measures are important, but they cannot get to the heart of what causes corruption. That core lies in our values, in our willingness to take responsibility and be guided by what is right, not what pays. That is the real lesson of the Flamingo case: integrity must always come first.
